WEKO3
アイテム
English as a Pro-Drop Language
https://iwate-pu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/553
https://iwate-pu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5534eb751b2-aeb0-441b-b434-76e10de2f830
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004256362.pdf (869.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-12-27 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | English as a Pro-Drop Language | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11332879 | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| タイトル | English as a Pro-Drop Language | |||||
| 著者 |
高橋 , 英也
× 高橋 , 英也× Takahashi, Hideya |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 岩手県立大学社会福祉学部 | ||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Since Rizzi's (1986) seminal work on phonologically null pronominals, how to derive the classification of the so-called pro-drop languages has long been controversial in the literature. Various alternative proposals emerged, and we have gained some understanding of some nontrivial generalizations behind the phenomenon, and a number of interesting empirical facts have also been accumulated. In general, we have learned a great deal about the nature of the phenomenon. In spite of this tradition, there have never been any analyses without recourse to Pro Module, a subtheory of grammar whose status in the architecture of language is unclear, which is mysterious given the reformulation of the so-called GB framework into the minimalist program from the latter half of the 1990s. This paper is an attempt to derive the effects of Pro Module solely from the morphological properties of functional elements T and AGR. Specifically, an optional syntactic feature [+F] at the head T and a parametric notion of [ d: Inherent] AGR are introduced. An immediate theoretical consequence of this proposal is that we need not invoke any independent subtheory of grammar such as Pro Module to explain the occurrence of pro . In addition, no parametric stipulation concerning a set of formal licensers is needed. The proposed analysis also has an empirical advantage in that it can cover a wider range of pro-drop languages than Rizzi's. In particular, it is shown that Sentential Subject Constructions and Locative Inversions in English are given a unified analysis on the assumption that expletive pro is available in those constructions, which implies that English is included in the class of pro-drop languages, in contrast to the prevailing view among generative grammarians. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
言語と文化 巻 5, p. 29-39, 発行日 2003-01-31 |
|||||
| 表示順 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 7 | |||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004256362 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13475967 | |||||
