WEKO3
アイテム
日本語の存在・所有形式におけるイル・アル交替現象
https://iwate-pu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/101
https://iwate-pu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1013c3f5992-897f-4679-8b6f-b88860120b94
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
リベラルアーツ10号 p.85-99 (1.3 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-06-23 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 日本語の存在・所有形式におけるイル・アル交替現象 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | The Syntax of Existential and Possessive Sentences in Japanese | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 存在・所有形式 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | イル・アル交替 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 与格主語 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 他動性 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 主語性 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
高橋 , 英也
× 高橋 , 英也× Takahashi, Hideya |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Languages vary as to how they express possessive relations in morphosyntax. The Slavic group of languages, for example, expresses those relations in the copular BE construction featuring a preposition. There is another group of languages, including Latin, in which the HAVE verb is employed for the possessive expression, though Dative Case in a copular BE sentence is the unmarked strategy. This phenomenon is well-known as the be/have alternation, and has been extensively studied in the generative literature since the beginning of the 1990s. Turning our eyes to Japanese, it has long been held in virtually all known studies or textbooks that it does not exhibit such an alternation. Possessive relations are expressed with the aid of two distinct existential verbs aru and iru, the choice of which is fundamentally governed by the (in)animacy of the Nominative-marked DP. The purpose of this paper is to argue that Japanese is among those languages which exhibit an alternation between HAVE and BE, in contrast to the prevailing view. Specifically, I first give a critical review of the two previous approaches to possessive and existential sentences with aru and iru, and show that neither of them is tenable. I will then propose a morphosyntactic analysis based on the assumption that a phonetically empty postposition and the existential iru are combined into the possessive aru in the course of the derivation, demonstrating that the proposed analysis is empirically superior to the previous ones. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
リベラル・アーツ en : Liberal arts 号 10, p. 85-99, 発行日 2016-03 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 岩手県立大学高等教育推進センター | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1881-6746 | |||||
